Turning it into a sprint
Going flat out sends the power soaring for 10 seconds, then lets it collapse. The session asks for the opposite: steady power over 30 seconds, the same from rep to rep. For all-out sprints, that's a different session.
Supramaximal 30-second intervals: 12 efforts at 210–230% of FTP, held at steady power, with 4 min 30 easy between. Six minutes of work in 80 minutes. A format studied in highly trained cyclists, with gains in time-trial performance.
| Target | Zone | Time | FTP 200 W | FTP 250 W | FTP 300 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 210–230% | 7Neuromusc. | 6 min | 420–460 W | 525–575 W | 630–690 W |
| 40–55% | 1Recovery | 60 min | 80–110 W | 100–138 W | 120–165 W |
Put this session on your bike computer or watch
Wattson works out the targets from your FTP and sends the session to your Garmin, Wahoo, Coros or Suunto.
Each effort is ridden well above what you can sustain aerobically: hence 'supramaximal'. Those 30 seconds lean hard on your anaerobic system and force your muscles to recruit as many fibres as they can. The long recovery lets you hold the same power across all 12 reps, and that repeated quality is the whole point.
The outcome is surprising: work this short improved time-trial performance in already highly trained cyclists, as much as long intervals near threshold. The mechanism may well differ; the authors themselves are cautious about it.
Trained and advanced riders with a background of hard sessions. The studies were on highly trained cyclists and triathletes. You need a recently measured FTP: unlike an all-out sprint, the power here is a real target.
One session of this kind a week is a common guideline, on fresh legs, after an easy day or a rest day. Avoid the day before a long ride, another hard session or a race. To ease in, start with 8 efforts and build to 12 over the weeks.
5′ at 45–55% FTP + 5′ at 56–65% FTP + 5′ at 66–75% FTP
15 minutes building from 45 to 75% of FTP, in 5-minute steps. On a smart trainer, switch to resistance or slope mode: in ERG, the trainer takes several seconds to reach the target, which eats a good chunk of each effort.
12 × 30″ at 210–230% FTP, 4′30 recovery
Twelve 30-second efforts at 210–230% of FTP, or 525 to 575 W for an FTP of 250 W. This isn't a sprint: get up to power within two or three pedal strokes, then hold it steady to the end. Aim for the same average on the first rep and the twelfth. Between efforts, 4 min 30 easy at 40–55% of FTP, or 100 to 138 W, still pedalling.
10′ at 40–55% FTP
10 very easy minutes at 40–55% of FTP. Check the average of your last three efforts: if it stayed in the range, keep these targets; if it dropped clearly, start lower next time.
Each effort is very hard, but it stops before you crack. The first four feel almost manageable. Around the eighth, the 4 min 30 recoveries suddenly seem shorter, and the last ten seconds of each effort really bite. Guide: 9 out of 10.
Going flat out sends the power soaring for 10 seconds, then lets it collapse. The session asks for the opposite: steady power over 30 seconds, the same from rep to rep. For all-out sprints, that's a different session.
The trainer takes several seconds to switch from recovery to effort: over 30 seconds, that's a lot. Resistance or slope mode, in the right gear, lets you hit your target straight away.
The difficulty comes from the repetition. Starting with 8 efforts shows whether your targets hold up over the whole session. Building to 12 afterwards beats finishing with four failed reps.
The 4 min 30 isn't a luxury. It's what lets you repeat quality efforts. With a shorter recovery the session drifts into different work, and your power fades by halfway.
Stepto and colleagues (Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999), well-trained cyclists, five formats compared: along with 8 × 4 minutes, 12 × 30 seconds at 175% of maximal aerobic power did most for 40 km time-trial performance, about 2.4%, possibly through a different mechanism according to the authors. Laursen and colleagues (Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002), 38 highly trained cyclists and triathletes: this format, with 4 min 30 of recovery, also improved time-trial performance and peak power. The studies don't specify the recovery intensity. The conversion to 210–230% of FTP, which assumes maximal aerobic power at around 120–130% of FTP, the recovery intensity, the warm-up and the cool-down are Wattson choices. Bottom line: good evidence.
At 210–230% of FTP: 420 to 460 W for an FTP of 200 W, 525 to 575 W for 250 W, 630 to 690 W for 300 W. Recoveries are at 40–55% of FTP. If the end of the session falls apart, start at the bottom of the range next time.
The studies set the intensity as a percentage of maximal aerobic power, measured in a lab, not of FTP. Estimating that power from your FTP gives this range. It's a Wattson conversion: if you know your maximal aerobic power, it will give you a more accurate target.
How you ride it. Here the power is steady and the same over 12 efforts. In all-out 30-second sprints, you start at maximum and the power fades; you only do four to six. Both formats have been studied, but for different reasons.
In two studies of highly trained cyclists, yes, over a few weeks, and as much as long intervals near threshold. Those are group results, not a personal promise. It's still one session among others, to be placed in a block where the endurance volume is already there.
An intuitive workout editor to build cycling and running sessions in no time, then sync them to your watch or bike computer: Wahoo, Garmin, Suunto or Coros.
Try this session